Open Sytten opened 4 years ago
Hey @Sytten :wave:,
Thank you for opening an issue. We will get back to you as soon as we can. Also, check out our Open Collective and consider contributing financially.
https://opencollective.com/graphql-shield
PS.: We offer
priority
support for all financial contributors. Don't forget to addpriority
label once you start contributing :smile:
Hey 👋 ,
Thank you for finding it out! Could you compose a small PR?
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
Not stale.
Sorry i didnt have time to work on this. Will try to send a PR otherwise I implemented the algo in nexus-shield feel free to copy it.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
Not stale.
Describe the bug
Here: https://github.com/maticzav/graphql-shield/blob/master/src/rules.ts#L395 And here: https://github.com/maticzav/graphql-shield/blob/master/src/rules.ts#L449
The concatenation is wrong, it will in reverse order compared to the order of the rules potentially leading to some unwanted behaviours.
They should be replaced by
[res, ...res]
to keep the order of the rules.