Closed decathorpe closed 1 year ago
As per MSRV policy, enabling features switches to a very aggressive MSRV:
When using other features, like parking_lot, MSRV might be updated more frequently, up to the latest stable.
I am not sure anything better is possible? If a user chooses to use once_cell with critical_section, they get the least conservative MSRV of the two crates.
Yeah, fair point. I just wanted to make sure that this wasn't an unintentional change. It's not a big problem in my case, I just disabled building + running the once_cell test suite for package builds on RHEL 9 (which is stuck at Rust 1.62.0). Thanks for clarifying!
Yeah, for test suite in particular, we don't give any MSRV guarantees, as that's not a part of the public API. But for the reference here's the part that runs the MSRV-compatible subset:
The
critical-section/std
feature has an MSRV of 1.63.0 (because it relies onMutex::new
being aconst fn
), which is kind of a big jump from 1.56.0. Since the root cause lies on a different crate, maybe this MSRV bump is unintentional?It doesn't affect
once_cell
if thecritical_section
feature is disabled or when not compiling the tests, so the MSRV bump in this specific circumstance might have gone unnoticed so far.