Uh, oh! 5 women in the study had glucose level 0. And 1 had level 44, etc. Presumably this is not physiologically possible.
Uh, oh! 5 women in the study had glucose level 0. And one had glucose = 44, etc. Presumably this is not physiologically possible.
And while WebMD says that 60 may be a "normal" pre-meal low (ref), I don't know the physiological possibility of 44. Since your follow-on fixing code addresses only the five 0s, perhaps the replacement should instead be:
Uh, oh! 5 women in the study had glucose level 0. Presumably this is not physiologically possible.
The way I'm interpreting it, the numbers are reversed. If you mean that "glucose = 44 had one observation", then my interpretation is wrong.
Suggested replacements:
And while WebMD says that 60 may be a "normal" pre-meal low (ref), I don't know the physiological possibility of 44. Since your follow-on fixing code addresses only the five 0s, perhaps the replacement should instead be:
Thanks, nice guide!