Open guziy opened 8 years ago
OK, sorry I was too soon to conclude about the rotpole, that one seems to be fine, my problem was the range of longitudes: I was using [0, 360] instead of [-180, 180] for rotation, and the results were weird...
The example above looks like an accuracy problem, which is understandable... So if it is OK with everyone I'll close the issue.
Cheers
Is cylindrical direction-preserving? I wish there was a simple table that showed projection type (rows) and property (columns) and stated whether that property was preserved or not.
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Huziy Oleksandr (Sasha) < notifications@github.com> wrote:
OK, sorry I was too soon to conclude about the rotpole, that one seems to be fine, my problem was the range of longitudes: I was using [0, 360] instead of [-180, 180] for rotation, and the results were weird...
The example below looks like an accuracy problem, which is understandable... So if it is OK with everyone I'll close the issue.
Cheers
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/matplotlib/basemap/issues/294#issuecomment-217483266
@WeatherGod the arrows are identical when either u or v component of the vector is 0, so I would expect it to be direction conserving...
I have another indication that there might be something wrong in case of the rotpole projection, I'll try to make an example with that, later when I have some time. But for now please see the example below, should those to arrows be identical in this projection? (red is the rotated one and green is the original one) ...
Cheers