Open BenediktO opened 3 years ago
My strong preference would be for such tools to be standalone projects. I suspect these days the qt version would also have been a standalone. The reason is that they accrue inconsistencies and require maintenance, and are hard to test. Hence they really require someone to take ownership.
I am personally not opposed to adding a tk version of formlayout (but you'll have to be the one writing it). I find figureoptions extremely useful, and it's a pity it's not available to other backends. To keep things maintainable, I'd say it should try to match the formlayout as much as possible, so that the matplotlib side of things stays the same.
This issue has been marked "inactive" because it has been 365 days since the last comment. If this issue is still present in recent Matplotlib releases, or the feature request is still wanted, please leave a comment and this label will be removed. If there are no updates in another 30 days, this issue will be automatically closed, but you are free to re-open or create a new issue if needed. We value issue reports, and this procedure is meant to help us resurface and prioritize issues that have not been addressed yet, not make them disappear. Thanks for your help!
Problem
It would be great if there was a dialog in the Tk backend similar to the figureoptions module of the Qt backend. This would make it really easy to configure plots when embedding in Tk GUIs.
Proposed Solution
In
backend/qt_editor/figureoptions.py
most of the work is already done. One would have to "only" implement a class equivalent to FormDialog inbackend/qt_editor/_formlayout.py
and the needed widgets. Is anything in this direction planned? I am willing to contribute to this feature.