matrix-org / complement

Matrix compliance test suite
Apache License 2.0
61 stars 52 forks source link

Refactor how skipped tests are defined #654

Open kegsay opened 1 year ago

kegsay commented 1 year ago

Complement was designed to test the Matrix Specification. However, the spec isn't static and MSCs need tests too. We introduced the build tag system a long time ago to allow tests to opt-in to certain tests. They are defined like this:

//go:build msc3391
// +build msc3391

package tests

// ... rest of code

and used like this:

go test -tags "msc3083 msc3787 msc3874" ./...

The set of tests run is controlled by the user, which can be frustrating when they get out-of-sync: https://github.com/matrix-org/complement/issues/185

This wasn't the end of it though. We also have unique APIs specific to a homeserver, or sometimes some servers don't implement core features which are enabled by default. To fix this, we (ab)use the same build tag system. To opt-out of a test, they are defined like this:

//go:build !dendrite_blacklist
// +build !dendrite_blacklist

package tests

// ... rest of code

and used like this:

go test -tags "dendrite_blacklist" ./...

This was the status quo for a long time, until there was a need to blacklist some tests in the same file but not others. This introduced the runtime package, where you could skip a test in code, rather than conditional compilation. They are defined like this:

func TestRoomImageRoundtrip(t *testing.T) {
    runtime.SkipIf(t, runtime.Dendrite)
    // .. rest of test
}

A runtime knows what it is by the virtue of the blacklist tag. E.g running -tags "dendrite_blacklist" would skip this test, even if the homeservers were synapse! The code for this is:

//go:build dendrite_blacklist
// +build dendrite_blacklist

package runtime

import (
    "context"
    "time"

    "github.com/docker/docker/client"
)

func init() {
    Homeserver = Dendrite
}

This is clearly at odds with testing between heterogeneous homeservers. It's also been questioned if it is the test's job to say what can and cannot run with it. Surely it would be better if it were more tag-like, and the user can opt-in to these tests?

We also have some other ideas for conditional execution of tests based on /versions output: https://github.com/matrix-org/complement/issues/549 . Our forebear, sytest, would automatically skip some tests based on if an earlier test which has a special can_ property did not pass. This is problematic if the can_ test is flakey!

From these use cases, there are some properties we want the test execution API to have:

A high-level approach here could be:

This would allow us to remove runtime.SkipIf from the codebase, and runtime detection which is flakey and doesn't work with multi-HS support. It also removes the smell of having tests dictate what can/cannot run.

Proposal

kegsay commented 1 year ago

Worth noting that Go supports regexp matching test names, so we could mux the group into the test name itself e.g TestMSC334455_NameOfTest(t *testing.T) but this would be convention and not enforced without extra tooling.

kegsay commented 1 year ago

dmr sez group by package plz.

kegsay commented 1 year ago

So we could change this to:

go test ./tests/csapi ./tests/ssapi ./tests/msc2836 ...

This:

This doesn't address blacklists though, as it isn't possible to use -runto exclude some tests.

Instead of saying "I am dendrite" and the tests then saying "skip this as it doesn't work on dendrite", we could instead add a new env var to control which tests are skipped. If the env var is missing, no tests are skipped (so it'll work in IDEs). If the env var is set, and said env var is a file say, then we could list off the tests to skip. E.g:

# skiptests.txt
TestFoo
TestBar
TestFederationKeyUploadQuery/Can_claim_remote_one_time_key_using_POST

Then in tests, we could add boilerplate to do this check and skip if found:

func TestFoo(t *testing.T) {
    maybeSkip(t)
}

func maybeSkip(t *testing.T) {
    skipFile := os.Getenv("COMPLEMENT_SKIP_TESTS")
    data, _ := io.ReadAll(skipFile)
    if strings.Contains(string(data), t.Name()) {
        t.Skipf("skipping test as it is in COMPLEMENT_SKIP_TESTS")
    }
}

The downside is it isn't clear what test names are always e.g:

func TestFederationKeyUploadQuery(t *testing.T) {
    t.Run("Can claim remote one time key using POST", func(t *testing.T) {
        t.Name() == "TestFederationKeyUploadQuery/Can_claim_remote_one_time_key_using_POST"
    }
}

So you can imagine future frustration if someone wants to skip this test and doesn't know the magic incantation of swapping ` for_. We could be kind here and add logs withCOMPLEMENT_DEBUG=1such that it logs the test name (and says it isn't skipping because it!=`). I don't propose mapping the text lines to automatically escape stuff, as that is more magic.

To avoid needing to call maybeSkip all the time, we could be cheeky and bundle it into Deploy which is what basically all tests immediately do, though subtests are an exception here so maybe not.

kegsay commented 1 year ago

as it isn't possible to use -run to exclude some tests.

Not entirely true, there is -skip 'TestFederatedEventRelationships|TestEventRelationships'. We could then potentially just accept a list of test names, escape them, then slap ORs on them. This would mean we wouldn't need additional boilerplate on every func Test and subtest. It looks like -skip is Go 1.20+ https://go.dev/doc/go1.20#go-command

kegsay commented 1 year ago

Next steps:

We may want to have a test directory up first to make it easier to know/discover which tests to skip?

kegsay commented 1 year ago

MSC work has landed. The remaining bits are to redo how skipped tests are specified in Complement. Renaming issue for clarity.

kegsay commented 1 year ago

The remaining work: