Open licaon-kter opened 5 years ago
I'm assuming this a gateway bug?
Is this issue is a good first issue to get started?
Errrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrm probably not, it's likely to be complicate :(
ejabberd blocking the whole bridge server:
s2s_access: s2s
acl:
...
blocked_servers:
server:
- "bridge.xmpp.matrix.org"
access_rules:
...
s2s:
- deny: blocked_servers
- allow
But my server log is full of:
[info] <0.5903.0>@ejabberd_s2s_in:handle_auth_success:181 (tls|<0.5903.0>) Accepted inbound s2s EXTERNAL authentication bridge.xmpp.matrix.org -> mydomain.tld (hidden_by_ejabberd)
[info] <0.5903.0>@ejabberd_s2s_in:process_closed:131 Closing inbound s2s connection bridge.xmpp.matrix.org -> mydomain.tld: Stream closed by local host: invalid-from
And my ghosts are stuck in the room:
Fun stuff, the [cnvrs]
user didn't even manage to actually join, more info here: https://github.com/conversejs/converse.js/issues/1459
@Half-Shot Plenty of commits in the mean time, some sound useful, they are not deployed yet?
Still an issue with the restarted bridge.
I also ran into this; I had to "solve" the problem with a swift
$ sudo iptables -I INPUT -p tcp -s 94.237.52.46 -j REJECT
(where that IP is lethe.matrix.org
). While it works, this solution isn't ideal...
irritating that the ejabberd log gist has been deleted. i've just tried to repro this with Adium and can't; parting the room seems to part the user correctly, and the MUC doesn't continue to relay messages after having parted.
Anyone know what's the difference is between libpurple parting a MUC and conversations?
@ara4n The gist disappearing must of been a cleaning mistake.
I believe this is fixed in #144
@Half-Shot do ping when that is actually deployed on the actual bridge, so we can test
I just got myself stuck in Hotel California today. I understand that fix has been running on matrix.org for a while now.
Yep, which room @auscompgeek ?
Apparently still an issue, reports from xmpp users of issues
@Half-Shot this needs to be fixed. I was on the fence before, but this is unusably frustrating...
I can confirm I cannot leave a matrix room
Forget it. Matrix/NewVector dont care about XMPP users. Remember that this is a corporate venture, and our experiences/opinions arent profitable. This will never be fixed.
this is still a thing, and as a result i keep getting notifications and messages from places i quite like to not be in anymore.
is there any workaround that doesn't involve just rejecting matrix network packets? i have some other matrix groups i want to be in on
Can't leave a room that hasn't been active anymore since August this year. I believe the room was either removed or something else happened, however, it's called xfz (Discord) and 6339 others
now and when I try to leave it the Matrix desktop client tells me that...
myusername:matrix.org not in room !yhqiEdqNjyPbxtUjzm:matrix.org.
Since this bug is still affecting XMPP users I propose to change the name of the bridge to "Hotel California".
Can confirm this issue exists. Adding the room JID to the blocklist seems to be the only solution for now. Also had delivery problems, in a sense that there was no indication if my message was actually sent to the room or not.
That is fixed and live on aria-net.org's Bifrost by way.
That is fixed and live on aria-net.org's Bifrost by way.
@maranda and is there a merge request for this repo?
Waiting to know about the fate of another PR, before I open more
@Half-Shot take heed? Your work has been done for you :)
Unless of course @ara4n is instructing you to leave this broken... guess we'll find out!
@Half-Shot, @ara4n: Have you taken a little time to look @maranda PR?
...as even if the user deletes the bookmark and closes the room, the bridge sends a
groupchat
message that will open up the unwanted chat, basically SPIM.Client side: https://github.com/siacs/Conversations/issues/3392
ejabberd log: https://gist.github.com/9d2601e0acefe836582aa73528f1d785
Temporary "solution": block domain and/or whole room in server s2s/c2s