check `/.well-known/matrix/client`

matrix-org / matrix-federation-tester

Tester for matrix federation written in golang.

80 stars 17 forks source link

check `/.well-known/matrix/client` #105

Open richvdh opened 4 years ago

richvdh commented 4 years ago

I'm not sure if scope-creeping the federation tester into a general "is my server behaving sanely" tester is something we should do, but:

We could usefully check that https://<server_name>/.well-known/matrix/client is sensible (for instance: does the m.homeserver point to a working client-server API?)

babolivier commented 4 years ago

I believe this is scope-creeping, as the federation tester should only test federation imho. Having a "is my hs all right" tool would definitely be helpful, but I'm not sure this is the right place to do it. Maybe we could have a matrix-client-tester project (or some other name of the same essence) that would perform some basic diagnostic on the CS API of a HS?

richvdh commented 4 years ago

I believe this is scope-creeping

well yes, hence my original comment "I'm not sure if scope-creeping ... is something we should do" :)

I guess I've got a couple of thoughts on this:

given that a "check my HS is ok" tool is useful, why not build it in here, and rename the project to "matrix-server-tester"? What advantage do we get from keeping the tools separate? I'm actually not sure there is a whole lot we can check about the C-S API without trying to log in, and at that point it feels like you're better off just pointing riot-web at the instance.
in any case, I'd like to plead client well-known as a bit of a special case, since unlike most of the rest of the C-S API, it operates on the server_name of the instance.

babolivier commented 4 years ago

well yes, hence my original comment "I'm not sure if scope-creeping ... is something we should do" :)

Yes, sorry I didn't make it obvious enough that I was replying to that :p

that a "check my HS is ok" tool is useful, why not build it in here, and rename the project to "matrix-server-tester"?

It's one possibility, we could probably change this project to be a broader HS tester, with tests on well-known client resolution and also some info-level stuff about e.g. available UIA flows or unstable features.

melroy89 commented 3 years ago

When checking the matrix/client (containing the base_url) we can also validate the public_baseurl? I think we are all on the same page about this additional federation test.

AndrewKvalheim commented 4 months ago

Validating org.matrix.msc3575.proxy would also be handy.