Closed bkellman closed 1 year ago
I played around a bit overnight and I think I may have resolved by re-installing BEER. Why would that impact alignment completion?
@bkellman Sorry for the headache here. It's hard to tell what going on with the log file when you're using using inputs which are not provided by the repository (sample_table_with_beads_and_lib2.csv). I'm assuming for now that your version simply updates the paths (fastq_filepath column) in the provided sample table relative to ../code/phip_flow/
.
In any case, it seems the log file you provided is saying the run completed as expected.
Workflow completed > WorkflowStats[succeededCount=40; failedCount=0
Can you specify which errors you are referring to? When I replicate this directory structure and run the command you supplied above, I get the following log output:
This looks normal/expected to me.
I played around a bit overnight and I think I may have resolved by re-installing BEER. Why would that impact alignment completion?
You are correct, the installation of BEER should not impact the alignment at all. But you're using the --profile docker
option, correct? In this case, you should not need to install anything except docker and nexflow. Out publicly hosted containers should handle all dependencies for you.
@jgallowa07 thanks for the quick response and sorry for the delay. I've been stuck at the bench the last few weeks. Returning to the code, I now realize that not every module is supposed to run. I think that was my mistake.
Thanks for your thorough response and sorry for my mistake.
I am running the phip-flow pipeline pancov demo using:
While the run terminated with several outputs, there were also multiple errors. nextflow.pancov.test.log.log Is this expected behavior? Is this resulting from an incomplete install?