Add tinfo to ncurses dependencies

[ghost]

In some Linux configurations, ncurses.so does not refer to tinfo.so, in which case -ltinfo has to be explicitly passed to the linker.

Please merge. Thanks.

[matszpk]

Because some other Linux doesn't have pkg config info about ncurses thus I added manually tinfo to dependencies.

[ghost]

Please note that open source development is also about tracking contributions made by concrete developers. Copying an idea from a pull request and not mentioning the developer who contributed the idea is stealing. I demand that you create another commit which will mention the developer who contributed the idea to your software. Thanks.

[matszpk]

Your last comment in big letters is obsolete. Maybe, I just will add your to contributors later. After some reconsiderations and problem researching I just solved issue in another way. I treated your pull request as an issue signaling. Please do not spam my project by adding obsolete comments. Your pull request is too small to treat as any important idea - please reconsider your conversation.

[ghost]

I don't understand why the comment would be obsolete.

You added your own name to small commits such as 0ac9d39a696a04c21a389bebf3200fba2374dc88 "Add .gitignore" which added 3 lines of text to the repository. Why didn't you post this small commit anonymously, since it is small and does not carry any fundamental ideas?

You aren't treating other people's small contributions in the same way as your own small contributions.

Please reconsider your behavior.

Thanks.

---

adjective: obsolete no longer produced or used; out of date. "the disposal of old and obsolete machinery"

verb: obsolete cause (a product or idea) to become obsolete by replacing it with something new. "we're trying to stimulate the business by obsoleting last year's designs"

[matszpk]

Firstly: your version of the contribution has been rejected because I found other problems with your changes in other Linux distros, so I decided to resolve your problem in different way. I expected that you will confirm that problem has been resolved. Please understand: I am not obligated to accept every contribution. Your contribution has been rejected due to technical problems in other Linux distros - that is all. I appreciate your engagement. This is my choice. Maybe later I will add some file with list of contributors.

[ghost]

No, it hasn't been rejected - it has been superseded. It it would have been rejected, you wouldn't be building your own commit on top of the idea in the pull request.

I believe that the best course of action would have been to merge the pull request as it is and then to create a new commit changing the pkg-config line to -ltinfo.

In any case, you are free to cherry pick the commit from my fork of your repository. Thanks.

[matszpk]

Thank you for explanation. However for me, no sensible reasons to create new commit after accepting your contribution. I just resolved your problem in other way - that's all. Ofcourse, you can make your own fork with your solution. I would like to close this idle discussion about that issue. Thanks.

[ghost]

True. But your repository has a greater momentum than mine because it has 164 github stars while mine is new and has 0 stars. It sometimes happens that a forked repository is more successful than the original one, but such cases are rare unless the original repository is no longer being maintained.

I think we can close this discussion. Enough has been written. Goodbye.