Closed mattbierner closed 10 years ago
Current syntax to curry two composed unary ops is:
(!) \> (!, ...);
The syntax
(!!, ...)
Would be a lot clearer.
At the very least, !! should be supported as it is fairly common.
!!
Would also allow better chaining of non-computed member unary fn:
(.x.y.z);
However, some care must be taken so that (!! x) is evaluated to an expression, while (!!, x) is !! curried with x.
(!! x)
(!!, x)
x
Current syntax to curry two composed unary ops is:
The syntax
Would be a lot clearer.
At the very least,
!!
should be supported as it is fairly common.