matter-labs / zksync-docs

Developer documentation site for zkSync community.
https://docs.zksync.io/
Apache License 2.0
4 stars 14 forks source link

[Feedback]: Account Type Capability Ambiguous #148

Open parseb opened 1 week ago

parseb commented 1 week ago

Page

https://docs.zksync.io/build/developer-reference/account-abstraction

Description

The text mentions EOAs, Contract accounts and then jumps to smart accounts. It does not seem clear for me if I can sponsor transactions for EOAs as most projects rely on existing ownership relations (msg.sender).

The major question being, can I sponsor a transaction for an EOA while keeping msg.sender the EOA? Feedback might be rushed, did not ponder, but first read, it was not clear for me.

Code of Conduct

Romsters commented 10 hours ago

@parseb yes, you can use paymaster. Paymaster can sponsor any transaction, transaction sender remains unchanged.