Areas of the API to consider harmonizing more with other packages:
[x] Uncertainties are added in pint with plus_minus(), while in quanstants we have plusminus() (which is an alias for with_uncertainty()) - _renamed alias to plus_minus() to match_
[ ] The equivalent of CompoundUnit in astropy is called CompositeUnit; maybe there is an example of the SI naming the product of unit multiplication?
[ ] Parsing of units - thinking here mainly of GNU units, but pint would be another option to consider
[ ] astropy has the DimensionlessUnit class, whereas quanstants has UnitlessUnit; they are different though, as a DimensionlessUnit can have a scaling factor and therefore is not necessarily equal to 1; quanstants.unitless is thus equivalent to astropy.units.unscaled_dimensionless
[ ] astropy considers radians and steradians as base units and angles as a dimension, with an option to consider them dimensionless
Areas of the API to consider harmonizing more with other packages:
pintwithplus_minus(), while inquanstantswe haveplusminus()(which is an alias forwith_uncertainty()) - _renamed alias toplus_minus()to match_astropyhas theDimensionlessUnitclass, whereasquanstantshasUnitlessUnit; they are different though, as aDimensionlessUnitcan have a scaling factor and therefore is not necessarily equal to 1;quanstants.unitlessis thus equivalent toastropy.units.unscaled_dimensionlessastropyconsiders radians and steradians as base units and angles as a dimension, with an option to consider them dimensionless