Closed chenjiaxiang closed 6 years ago
Sorry, I have not found a way to reproduce the paper’s result. 0.66 is also the result on my machine.
Thanks, I will try to add char level embedding and run the code
发自我的 iPhone
在 2017年12月18日,21:52,EviscerateZ notifications@github.com 写道:
Sorry, I have not found a way to reproduce the paper’s result. 0.66 is also the result on my machine.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
Actually, I have added convolutional char embedding in my local dev branch. The performance improved only a little (1%). In their ACL paper, they also reported that the performance decreased by 0.9% F1 score without char embedding.
I know.thanks lot
发自我的 iPhone
在 2017年12月20日,10:44,EviscerateZ notifications@github.com 写道:
Actually, I have added convolutional char embedding in my local dev branch. The performance improved only a little (1~2%).
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
hello,i don't find a email address on your homepage,so leave an issue. I ran your r-net code, and i found the best accuracy is or so 0.66, the result is not as good as result they reported in the paper, you had pointed out that you directly used glove in char embedding. But the gap shouldn't be so big, i want to know the best result on your machine. Thanks a lot. You can reply here or send email to me. cjx123@mail.ustc.edu.cn