Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
These look like very nice, both for being useful in and of themselves, and as
good examples of how to use the 1D code. My one concern is about the included
license. I think it would be best to keep only the copyright statement, and
implicitly defer to the License.txt for the full license (as is done in many of
the other Cantera source files). Otherwise, it complicates defining the license
under which the whole of Cantera is distributed. Would this change be
acceptable?
Original comment by yarmond
on 29 Aug 2014 at 4:19
Thank you for your comments!
Yes, I would be perfectly fine with a shorter and clearer copyright statement.
I just took the original one from ck2cti.py, which was the first statement with
a name in it that I found.
I uploaded a modified version. I also updated the strain rate computations to
the routines now implemented.
Original comment by thetruet...@googlemail.com
on 29 Aug 2014 at 10:30
Attachments:
This issue was closed by revision r3136.
Original comment by yarmond
on 2 Sep 2014 at 10:34
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
thetruet...@googlemail.com
on 6 Aug 2014 at 4:26Attachments: