Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Shouldn't the warning about flame width suggest *increasing* the inlet mass
fluxes?
Original comment by yarmond
on 29 Aug 2014 at 4:08
Oh, yes this is definitively true. Thank you!
I attached a modified patch correcting this.
I also exchanged the sentence 'Consider decreasing the ratio of the oxidizer
inlet mass flux to the fuel inlet mass flux' to 'Consider *increasing* the
ratio of the *fuel* inlet mass flux to the *oxidizer* inlet mass flux'. I hope
that this helps to not drive people into the first warning if the fuel peak is
close to a boundary.
Original comment by thetruet...@googlemail.com
on 29 Aug 2014 at 9:53
Attachments:
This issue was closed by revision r3134.
Original comment by yarmond
on 2 Sep 2014 at 10:34
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
thetruet...@googlemail.com
on 7 Aug 2014 at 1:30Attachments: