Collecting plots to include

[jpivarski]

This checklist is a collection of plots that I think would be useful. Any one of us can actually do it; if I've found a block of time and I'm putting things into the talk, I'll check here first to see if it's already checked off. (Check off an item when you start putting it in, so that we don't do it at the same time.)

I was trying to sneak this in between things during the day; it's not complete!

Can be in anybody's section, or a general section at the beginning or end:

• [x] Python + Jupyter adoption in CMS, after removing the "Analysis Ecosystem I" label and line in Inkscape. Presuming that CMS is typical, this shows the rapid adoption of Python for analysis in recent years. (It explicitly separates out Python for job-configuration.)
  • Added in PR #6 as figures/github-language-fullstudy-for-review.svg
  • @matthewfeickert using in PR #5
• [x] Python package adoption in CMS, also after removing the "Analysis Ecosystem I" marker. This one is more dramatic than the last, since the use of NumPy/Matplotlib/Pandas/TensorFlow grew by about a factor of 10 since 2014 and is now on par with traditional analysis (ROOT). This and the above are better than older versions of this plot because the key part is now indicated with shading.
  • Added in PR #6 as figures/github-package-fullstudy-for-review.svg
  • @matthewfeickert using in PR #5
• [x] Again with the "Analysis Ecosystem I" marker removed, this frame, followed by this frame, shows the dramatic rise of Scikit-HEP in the same period with download rates (in MacOS and Windows, so no batch jobs, and without being limited to CMS).
  • Added in PR #6 as figures/pip-macwin-scikithep-log-by-package.svg and figures/pip-macwin-scikithep-log-combined.svg
  • @matthewfeickert using in PR #5
• [x] This is the Jake Vanderplas "shells" using Scikit-HEP packages.
  • Added in PR #6 as figures/shells-hep.svg
  • @matthewfeickert using in PR #5
• [x] This one seems less relevant to me, but it's the rise of Python/data science tools juxtaposed on the LHC timeline. I've used it to dispel the notion that Python is an "upstart" thing that might be gone next year, that it's been growing on the same timescale that we've been focused on. But the LHC timescale doesn't have a strong resonance with this audience. So I'll cross this one out.
• [ ] These five plots: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, are all of the programming language rankings that I know of, and Python is at the top of all five. This would be a good lead for "Why Python?" if there's any question about it. (We're preaching to the choir, but maybe the DoEPy group will want to use that in their own stuff.) Here is how to display it nicely in a Beamer slide.

Should be in mine; this checklist is for me:

• [ ] Timeline of Awkward Array, will probably need to add Uproot back in, as in this version of it.

[matthewfeickert]

Thanks @jpivarski. These are most of the ones (plus more) that I was pulling out of your talks this afternoon to include in my slide writing tonight, so this helps a lot to have them collated and with context!

[jpivarski]

Another that we might be looking for:

• [ ] Cabinetry vertical slice