Closed fipoucat closed 1 year ago
@fipoucat Please use the provided template to report issues, so that we know what environment you work in and what w2w / wrf version you use.
@andreazonato have you seen this error before?
Thank you Mattias, I was able to do the simulation using a restart strategy after reporting the same issue to wrf forum. The problem is mainly due to the size of my inner domain too small because of the adjustment done based on my LCZ map. The causes of number of processor to use with the other domains. I then need a wider LCZ map for my city (Dakar) and wonder how to get it?
So you adjusted your WRF domain based on the available LCZ map? That is bad practice.
First you need to decide upon a proper inner WRF domain. Then you can apply W2W, using an LCZ map that is slightly larger than the WRF domain in all directions.
As indicated in the W2W JOSS paper, there are various ways to get your LCZ map: the LCZ Generator, the global LCZ map, ...
Please, always read all documentation in detail, it is there for a reason.
I agree with @matthiasdemuzere .
The issue is linked to the mismatch between num_land_cat and LCZ. You should correctly provide the number of classes so WRF can identify it as WUDAPT instead of traditional 31-33 classes
I agree and appreciate your suggestions. In fact I used the generated LCZ done by Oscar and available on the table of cities. I had a problem because it looks there are problems in the NW and SW corners with these white spaces and then obliged to cut the domain. Could you advise on this so the I can use the full extent of the map?
You refer to this submission?
If this geotif fits your needs, you can fill the white areas with label 17 (= G = water), so that it will work with w2w.
Yes, it is that submission., this geotiff looks fine for my needs. I'll try to do the filling with QGIS then.
Thank you
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 10:59 AM Matthias Demuzere @.***> wrote:
You refer to this submission https://lcz-generator.rub.de/factsheets/06c1a0faae69f5d888e24ac4d8bf07bdbb29db08/06c1a0faae69f5d888e24ac4d8bf07bdbb29db08_factsheet.html ?
If this geotif fits your needs, you can fill the white areas with label 17 (= G = water), so that it will work with w2w.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/matthiasdemuzere/w2w/issues/111#issuecomment-1479352473, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAXY6LLB7G2TKMISUMKM6NLW5LLSFANCNFSM6AAAAAAV6YB5S4 . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
@matthiasdemuzere. I tried but looks it is not possible because this white areas are not in the labels. Any other idea on doing the change? I have clipped a similar area from the global map but the generated one looks far more accurate.
The white areas in the .tif are 0's which you have to replace by value 17 (=water). As this is a basic geospatial operation, you'll have to figure this one out yourself.
Ok, thank you
I am running a test test simulation but noticed an error message related to URBPARM_LCZ:
I am reporting in case someone can help understand and fix the issue.
Thank you