mattjshannon / scipy_proceedings

Tools used to generate the SciPy conference proceedings
Other
0 stars 0 forks source link

Outline of proceedings content #1

Open mattjshannon opened 6 years ago

mattjshannon commented 6 years ago

Copy/pasting Christiaan's thoughts here, first of all:

mattjshannon commented 6 years ago

Next question is, based on what we have written so far, which of these have we completed/are we satisfied with?

PAHdb commented 6 years ago

A good way forward would be to turn the above outline into sections/sub-sections. Once that is done it should be straightforward to identify what still needs work and what is completed/we are satisfied with.

In order to get a handle on inserting graphics and checking whether I can push to the repository, I intend to add the nice JWST-rendering I have from Maya.

mattjshannon commented 6 years ago

I've started sectioning out the .rst file with the suggestions up top. One thing I want to check is how the online .rst version compares to the compiled .pdf. **added a bunch of subsections.

PAHdb commented 6 years ago

Great! In the meantime I've added some text on PAHdb with a screenshot of the website landing page -possibly a screenshot showing the details on coronene would be more illustrative. In addition, I've made a start with the pypahdb section. Next I was thinking of adding some math to show the emission model used, i.e., a simply blackbody function an emission profile and perhaps a figure with the evolution from a stick-spectrum to a full spectrum.

PAHdb commented 6 years ago

I've added a section on the PAH emission model, but haven't put in a figure yet illustrating the evolution from sticks to spectrum -I'll have a go at that tomorrow.

PAHdb commented 6 years ago

So, I've added the figure illustrating the evolution from sticks to spectrum. Also, I've started working on the 'showcasing' by adding some of the outputs from pypahdb. Much of the basics is now in the .rst-file. The next step would be discussing the code in more detail and looking at the benchmarking.

mattjshannon commented 6 years ago

I think we've settled on this structure (sections/subsections), which is the paper as it stands now (slightly paraphrased)

Can probably close this on Monday after submitting the draft, and then handle the reviewer's suggestions as separate issues as needed?