search

mattrglobal / jwm

JSON Web Message (JWM) RFC
16 stars 6 forks source link

add mime-types #43

Open TomCJones opened 4 years ago

TomCJones commented 4 years ago

it might be inferred that it is application-jose, but i think it would be better to call it out

TomCJones commented 4 years ago

here is a comment from jim fenton, which i do not agree with, but want him to be heard; From jimfenton to Everyone: 02:53 PM Unfortunately application.jose doesn’t do quite what I was referring to, because it points to RFC 7515 (JWS). We need a way to specify parts that are plain text, images, HTML, … From jimfenton to Everyone: 02:58 PM No, not at the http level…I’m talking about the content of the body element. From Me to Everyone: 03:01 PM I agree with that part of Jims comment so long as i do not have to use mime-types internally

tplooker commented 4 years ago

To be clear what this issue is asking for is defining the mime-type used by the transport layer responsible for sending the JWM? As opposed to the internal mime-type that may be included in a JWM to describe some of the embedded content?