Closed kdenhartog closed 4 years ago
I've seen the name headers being tossed around a bit when referring to the "attributes" defined in this JWM spec. Should we consider renaming these to headers to align language of the spec and how it's used?
I have heard this too however i think it clashes with the usage of the term JOSE header
good ole' namespace collisions...
I've seen the name headers being tossed around a bit when referring to the "attributes" defined in this JWM spec. Should we consider renaming these to headers to align language of the spec and how it's used?