Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
One possible fix is to show a different airplane icon, or maybe an overlay on
top of the airplane icon, when there's no new position information. Maybe
overlay a question mark or X or something like that.
Also, rather than replacing the entire map with a blank screen and "Searching
for GPS", do as Chris suggests and show the map of the last known position.
Maybe replace the top panel with "Searching for GPS" or something along those
lines.
Assigning for UX mock up
Original comment by ph...@google.com
on 4 Sep 2010 at 11:47
Another user request to show "last known location" instead of blank screen.
I don't like the idea of replacing the top panel because that information might
be useful still but we need to make sure the user knows the information shown
is out of date and we're trying to reestablish the lost signal. I like the idea
of removing the airplane and either putting something else there or changing
its appearance with a message somewhere that we're searching for GPS without
disabling other features.
Original comment by bonnieri...@google.com
on 7 Sep 2010 at 7:02
Definitely approve of the idea of changing the airplane icon -- that's the
perfect place to communicate state. I think freezing display movement at "last
known good location" and keeping airport information available at whatever zoom
level is good. This gets more challenging once multitouch/pan+zoom is possible
on the map. I guess maybe the interaction doesn't ever change, but your
aircraft icon becomes pinned and the UI clearly indicates it's offline.
I'll cook up an alternate icon treatment for use now.
Original comment by sh...@google.com
on 7 Sep 2010 at 7:25
[deleted comment]
For comments 2 & 3, does that mean the panning behavior is different when
there's no recent GPS position?
Having the "good position" indication at the top panel (or some other fixed
location that won't change when panning) is the least confusing to me. Related
to this, when we add a simulator mode, we'll want to have an indication that
the position shown is not real but simulated.
Maybe we could have a little GPS icon showing the quality (sample values: old,
poor accuracy, good accuracy) and source (real or simulated GPS) of the GPS
position.
Original comment by ph...@google.com
on 8 Sep 2010 at 1:21
I think we should be careful not to combine too many issues into one. I see
the following concerns:
- show accuracy of the provided location (Maps does it with a circle)
- clearly indicate when in simulation mode
Panning is an orthogonal issue: no matter what the displayed map region is, if
the provided location (i.e. the airplane icon) is visible, an indication of its
accuracy is needed.
Finally, considering the importance of knowing whether we're in simulation mode
or not, I would recommend clearly displaying "SIMULATION" somewhere on the
screen when applicable. Note that using the accuracy indicator for this
purpose would prevent us from simulating different location accuracies.
Original comment by aristi...@google.com
on 8 Sep 2010 at 2:23
When I have no GPS coverage at all (while underneath an apparently very thick
layer of storm clouds, for example) it would be nice to be presented an option
to show the last-known information, however inaccurate. When we have pan, the
user can approximate their current location in the screen. Maybe we could grey
out the airplane icon as well as the distance-to and bearing information in the
tapcard.
Original comment by bonnieri...@google.com
on 24 Oct 2010 at 9:33
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
bonnieri...@google.com
on 3 Sep 2010 at 6:36