Attached is the current agreement with TRAVIS. The agreement is better than before when using the atomic number, but still isn't perfect. This is due to slight differences in cromer-mann coefficients between periodic table and TRAVIS. I may have to manually input these coefficients to reach complete agreement with TRAVIS.
This PR addresses #1 to evaluate the form factors. Currently, I added a dependency for the package
periodic table
(https://periodictable.readthedocs.io/en/latest/api/cromermann.html) to get the form factors from cromer-mann tables.Attached is the current agreement with TRAVIS. The agreement is better than before when using the atomic number, but still isn't perfect. This is due to slight differences in cromer-mann coefficients between
periodic table
and TRAVIS. I may have to manually input these coefficients to reach complete agreement with TRAVIS.