Closed andreineculau closed 10 years ago
If coffeekup supports coffeescript helpers, then why not add support for requiring a module?
One could then require "fs", read files, etc
I second that, but just to clarify it - a require inside a template, so the scope is not too narrowed down.
please see issue #110
If coffeekup supports coffeescript helpers, then why not add support for requiring a module?
One could then require "fs", read files, etc