Closed vancleve closed 3 years ago
No, not really. But you could add an assertion to at least catch it, at least if property b==a+1
must hold.
Yes, right. One can implement tests on a case-by-case basis. I'll give it a go.
Another thing you can do, if it always holds, is to use getproperty and calculated it on the fly.
ah yes, great idea!
If there is parameter interdependence like below, updating the value of an independent parameter when copying or reconstructing a parameter object does not update the value of the dependent parameter.
Any ideas how to get around this?