Closed mollux closed 8 months ago
tagging some people for awareness: @luizeof @wget @ilkkao @escopecz @RCheesley @mabumusa1
Yes, it's confusing with the M2 as latest. Let's address that; your suggestion is a good one.
Agreed, normally latest points to the very latest available version of the app. No reason to deviate from that standard I think.
thansk for the feedback, let's proceed.
I'll update the latest
tag together with the release of Mautic 5.0.3
hereby the latest tags points to what we agreed upon! https://hub.docker.com/r/mautic/mautic/tags
There is currently some confusion about the
latest
tag on Dockerhub.The main confusion is that https://hub.docker.com/r/mautic/mautic/tags shows the
latest
as first tag (that's a Dockerhub issue) , and that that tag points to an image with Mautic 2.16.2 (that's our issue).This was decided when releasing the M4 Docker images, see https://github.com/mautic/docker-mautic/tree/mautic4?tab=readme-ov-file#pulling-mautic-images-from-docker-hub.
While IMO it's not a good practice to depend on the
latest
tag for multiple reasons (a quick search on docker latest tag should give some pointers), we should ensure that it points to something that we define aslatest
, or remove it completely.I would suggest (based on the common practices in other repo's), that we keep the concept of
latest
tag, and point it to the last stable patch release in the last minor and major release, in the preferred variant of the image, beingapache
.Practical example:
latest
would point to5.0.2-apache
latest
will point to5.1.0-apache
5.0.3
next week,latest
will still point to5.1.0-apache
, as 5.0 is not the last major and minor releaseany objections against this? I'll tag some people in the comments that I know of are involved in the Docker images, but please give your 2c if you have any