Open MartenBE opened 3 years ago
Why do you leave the room rather than keeping it there like you would on Facebook Messenger? This sounds more like a case of user-error than anything. I'm not saying your usage scenario is invalid, but I don't think it's what's intended.
Why do you leave the room rather than keeping it there like you would on Facebook Messenger? This sounds more like a case of user-error than anything. I'm not saying your usage scenario is invalid, but I don't think it's what's intended.
This is possible. I guess there are 2 visions: a keep-everything-open-vision, like Messenger, or a keep-it-clean approach like I do with mail. Maybe this could be adressed with documentation? The loss of messages without the user knowing is still a problem however (even if it doesn't fit the correct usage) ...
Did you ever figure out rejoining? Just had a friend leave a group room, and it's been a while since I last looked at this.
No, the risk of losing messages proved to be too much and I now reluctantly use Messenger Desktop instead of this bridge.
This is still the case. On new messages to facebook group chat, matrix user is not re-invited. There is no way for the matrix user to search / by id (messenger.com URL) rejoin a messenger chat.
Related: #174
keep-it-clean approach like I do with mail
so it seems like you really want is for there to be an "archive" feature in Matrix
For DM's everything works as expected:
For group chats, something goes wrong:
I have left the room at
2021-05-18 15:42:41,977
and have missed the messages in the log since that point. I wasn't reinvited in the room. Usingrefresh
reinvites me into the room, but unknowing users could have missed messages in this case if they rely on the behavior of DM's.