Closed kubo6472 closed 2 weeks ago
I suppose there are two ways to think about this:
If you can do two different schemas of users, if that's desired? I don't know the spec that well enough (at all)
I am currently running two instances of the meta bridge, each in a different mode (facebook and messsenger), because I have users on our synapse servers with a facebook and messenger only account. I have setup the bridges with their own db, separate user account for systemd service, separate ports etc.
I am not sure if the username_template should be different or whether it can be the same. I decided to use the bridge mode as the username_template prefix but it does create duplicated users:
I know this was already dismissed as not planned/low priority, but I'd still love for this to be runable as a single bridge either creating two admin rooms, or One room with commands like login-fb and login-ig.
There was also some talk that encryption might be powered by whatsmeow and WhatsApp might be a part of this bridge's code. I doubt that's in any short term plans, though.