Open MxMarx opened 1 year ago
Having multiple programs using the same database is usually not a good idea, although not sure why it isn't working even then, that method uses a transaction for both the delete and copy https://github.com/mautrix/python/blob/master/mautrix/client/state_store/asyncpg/store.py#L156
Weird, it seems like the transaction should prevent this. I'm using ansible to install the maubot container, I'll take a look at my configuration to see if I broke anything.
Here's a minimal example. If I create two instances of this plugin in the Maubot web-ui, around half the time, just one will respond to the command.
from maubot import Plugin, MessageEvent
from maubot.handlers import command, event
class BotThatWorksDifferentlyInDirectMessages(Plugin):
@command.new(name="isdirect")
async def is_direct(self, evt: MessageEvent) -> None:
joined_members = await self.client.get_joined_members(room_id=evt.room_id)
if len(joined_members) <= 2:
await evt.reply(f"There are {len(joined_members)} members in this room so it's a direct message!")
else:
await evt.reply(f"There are {len(joined_members)} members in this room so it's a group chat!")
I'm using
get_joined_members()
for a bot to determine if a room is a direct message.If multiple instances of the bot are running, I occasionally get this this error:
It looks like this is happening because set_members works by deleting a room's members from the database and then inserting the new member list returned by
get_joined_members
, so if this function is simultaneously called by two bots, the old rows and removed at the same time and then duplicate new rows are added which results in the error.It seems like this could be fixed by adding an
ON CONFLICT (user_id, device_id) DO NOTHING
, but I haven't done a pull request becauseset_members
usescopy_records_to_table
for postgresql andexecutemany
for the other databases and I'm not familiar enough with them to be confident.