Open mhkabir opened 8 years ago
Thanks Kabir. All I can tell so far is that parameters appear to be sent correctly from Pixhawk, each associated with the node ID it was retrieved from. I would hazard a guess that the node ID is probably being ignored in QGC.
Bug in the MAVLink/UAVCAN bridge; see https://github.com/PX4/Firmware/pull/5271#issuecomment-238399392
The grouping of parameters is controller by firmware meta data. I don't have any UAVCAN hardware so I can't look at this myself. An image would be helpful to determine if there is really anything wrong on the QGC side.
The parameters from connected UAVCAN nodes should each appear under a different heading per node.
Instead it's all mishmashed under Default Parameters and impossible to use.
@pavel-kirienko will be able to better explain where the issue might lie.