Open max-mapper opened 10 years ago
I'm looking into it
I'm getting ~4800 rows/s using this example
var csv = require('csv-parser')
var gunzip = require('gunzip-maybe')
var speedometer = require('speedometer')
var fs = require('fs')
var speed = speedometer()
fs.createReadStream('/tmp/wise-allwise-cat-part26.gz')
.pipe(gunzip())
.pipe(csv({separator:'|', headers:'designation|ra|dec|sigra|sigdec|sigradec|glon|glat|elon|elat|wx|wy|cntr|source_id|coadd_id|src|w1mpro|w1sigmpro|w1snr|w1rchi2|w2mpro|w2sigmpro|w2snr|w2rchi2|w3mpro|w3sigmpro|w3snr|w3rchi2|w4mpro|w4sigmpro|w4snr|w4rchi2|rchi2|nb|na|w1sat|w2sat|w3sat|w4sat|satnum|ra_pm|dec_pm|sigra_pm|sigdec_pm|sigradec_pm|pmra|sigpmra|pmdec|sigpmdec|w1rchi2_pm|w2rchi2_pm|w3rchi2_pm|w4rchi2_pm|rchi2_pm|pmcode|cc_flags|rel|ext_flg|var_flg|ph_qual|det_bit|moon_lev|w1nm|w1m|w2nm|w2m|w3nm|w3m|w4nm|w4m|w1cov|w2cov|w3cov|w4cov|w1cc_map|w1cc_map_str|w2cc_map|w2cc_map_str|w3cc_map|w3cc_map_str|w4cc_map|w4cc_map_str|best_use_cntr|ngrp|w1flux|w1sigflux|w1sky|w1sigsk|w1conf|w2flux|w2sigflux|w2sky|w2sigsk|w2conf|w3flux|w3sigflux|w3sky|w3sigsk|w3conf|w4flux|w4sigflux|w4sky|w4sigsk|w4conf|w1mag|w1sigm|w1flg|w1mcor|w2mag|w2sigm|w2flg|w2mcor|w3mag|w3sigm|w3flg|w3mcor|w4mag|w4sigm|w4flg|w4mcor|w1mag_1|w1sigm_1|w1flg_1|w2mag_1|w2sigm_1|w2flg_1|w3mag_1|w3sigm_1|w3flg_1|w4mag_1|w4sigm_1|w4flg_1|w1mag_2|w1sigm_2|w1flg_2|w2mag_2|w2sigm_2|w2flg_2|w3mag_2|w3sigm_2|w3flg_2|w4mag_2|w4sigm_2|w4flg_2|w1mag_3|w1sigm_3|w1flg_3|w2mag_3|w2sigm_3|w2flg_3|w3mag_3|w3sigm_3|w3flg_3|w4mag_3|w4sigm_3|w4flg_3|w1mag_4|w1sigm_4|w1flg_4|w2mag_4|w2sigm_4|w2flg_4|w3mag_4|w3sigm_4|w3flg_4|w4mag_4|w4sigm_4|w4flg_4|w1mag_5|w1sigm_5|w1flg_5|w2mag_5|w2sigm_5|w2flg_5|w3mag_5|w3sigm_5|w3flg_5|w4mag_5|w4sigm_5|w4flg_5|w1mag_6|w1sigm_6|w1flg_6|w2mag_6|w2sigm_6|w2flg_6|w3mag_6|w3sigm_6|w3flg_6|w4mag_6|w4sigm_6|w4flg_6|w1mag_7|w1sigm_7|w1flg_7|w2mag_7|w2sigm_7|w2flg_7|w3mag_7|w3sigm_7|w3flg_7|w4mag_7|w4sigm_7|w4flg_7|w1mag_8|w1sigm_8|w1flg_8|w2mag_8|w2sigm_8|w2flg_8|w3mag_8|w3sigm_8|w3flg_8|w4mag_8|w4sigm_8|w4flg_8|w1magp|w1sigp1|w1sigp2|w1k|w1ndf|w1mlq|w1mjdmin|w1mjdmax|w1mjdmean|w2magp|w2sigp1|w2sigp2|w2k|w2ndf|w2mlq|w2mjdmin|w2mjdmax|w2mjdmean|w3magp|w3sigp1|w3sigp2|w3k|w3ndf|w3mlq|w3mjdmin|w3mjdmax|w3mjdmean|w4magp|w4sigp1|w4sigp2|w4k|w4ndf|w4mlq|w4mjdmin|w4mjdmax|w4mjdmean|rho12|rho23|rho34|q12|q23|q34|xscprox|w1rsemi|w1ba|w1pa|w1gmag|w1gerr|w1gflg|w2rsemi|w2ba|w2pa|w2gmag|w2gerr|w2gflg|w3rsemi|w3ba|w3pa|w3gmag|w3gerr|w3gflg|w4rsemi|w4ba|w4pa|w4gmag|w4gerr|w4gflg|tmass_key|r_2mass|pa_2mass|n_2mass|j_m_2mass|j_msig_2mass|h_m_2mass|h_msig_2mass|k_m_2mass|k_msig_2mass|x|y|z|spt_ind|htm20'.split('|')}))
.on('data', function(data) {
console.log(speed(1))
})
Could you try running that as well so we can compare outputs?
Looking at the tsv file it seems every row has ~300 columns. Since the csv's we normally benchmark have around ~30 columns we should probably expect at 10x slowdown
to reproduce:
download this file (at least the first few MBs of it, its a ~9GB file):
pipe it into the parser command:
it's only parsing like 1500 rows/s for me :(
cc @mafintosh