search

maxheld83 / pensieve

R package for the scientific study of human subjectivity.
https://www.maxheld.de/pensieve
GNU Affero General Public License v3.0
11 stars 2 forks source link

discuss different logics for rotation #441

Open maxheld83 opened 5 years ago

maxheld83 commented 5 years ago

rotations

jfou commented 5 years ago

Nice! Thanks, Max.

Any thoughts in including the logic of oblique rotations like centriod for when the statements have clear correlations? (sorry to bring that back, I'm just following your excellent progress!)

Jeremy

---------- Original Message ---------- From: Maximilian Held notifications@github.com To: maxheld83/pensieve pensieve@noreply.github.com Cc: Subscribed subscribed@noreply.github.com Subject: [maxheld83/pensieve] discuss different logics for rotation (#441) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:40:51 -0700

—You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

Drink This Before Bed, Watch Your Body Fat Melt Like Crazy wisemed.life http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3131/5bd1b7d33624b37d26accst01duc

maxheld83 commented 5 years ago

Hi Jeremy, sorry I'm not sure I fully get the question. Oblique rotations are also on the roadmap, but are probably a ways off (they make interpretation and some of the customarily used plots really difficult).

jfou commented 5 years ago

Hi Max,

I'm sorry I wasn't clear. I was asking if the logic of oblique rotations was going to be included since they are very useful in certain situations, such as when statements have inherent correlations and/or overlap.

As you point out, those rotations are more difficult and complicated, so I'm glad they remain on the roadmap. Great progress on the Pensieve framework so far!

Jeremy

---------- Original Message ---------- From: Maximilian Held notifications@github.com To: maxheld83/pensieve pensieve@noreply.github.com Cc: Jeremy awiggin@juno.com, Comment comment@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [maxheld83/pensieve] discuss different logics for rotation (#441) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 13:12:36 +0000 (UTC)

Hi Jeremy, sorry I'm not sure I fully get the question.

Oblique rotations are also on the roadmap, but are probably a ways off (they make interpretation and some of the customarily used plots really difficult). —You are receiving this because you commented.Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

We Say Goodbye To Kathie Lee Gifford track.volutrk.com http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3131/5bd2120ab6cfc120a0406st02duc

maxheld83 commented 5 years ago

definitely! I'm tracking support for oblique rotations in https://github.com/maxheld83/pensieve/issues/442