Closed jianqiu closed 8 years ago
Overall looks good @jianqiu, however, see my comments. I think this needs to be in CPI as utility unless the answer to my question is yes and you can point me to SL docs online. Thx
Ok @jianqiu what about this proposed compromise:
utils
packageThat way we do not break the main design point of SL go to reflect the SL APIs 1-to-1 as much as possible, yet allow useful "extensions" like this one to exist into utilities. We could even in time create things like utils/storage
and utils/virtual_guest
etc.
What do you think JQ?
@maximilien @mattcui Max, I already updated the PR and removed all special methods, made just 1-to-1 mapping. And the PR had resolved issue 110, Simyung Yang already closed it. Thanks!
Merging for purposes of solving issue #110 but please address my comment, remove the methods we are not implementing rather than returning some special errors.
This PR is trying to fix the issue 110