Closed gitonthescene closed 3 years ago
I suspect that you passed the command without single quotes around the claim id, which means that the dollar sign was interpreted as a shell argument, and that wb data
, not finding a claim id, fall back on trying to find anything that looks like an entity id:
# Equivalent to `wb data Q4115189`, will fetch the whole entity data
wb data Q4115189$C654B493-7EAF-46FC-997B-560D8A50F67F
# You can see why by passing that same argument to echo
echo Q4115189$C654B493-7EAF-46FC-997B-560D8A50F67F
# outputs `Q4115189-7EAF-46FC-997B-560D8A50F67F` (unless you have a variable named C654B493 in your environment)
# will fetch only the desired claim
wb data 'Q4115189$C654B493-7EAF-46FC-997B-560D8A50F67F'
To not get into this kind of dollar sign interpretation issues, you may prefer to use the hyphenated claim id syntax, where $
is replaced with a -
:
wb data Q4115189-C654B493-7EAF-46FC-997B-560D8A50F67F
Thanks for replying. I'll double check next time.
It might be worth mentioning that the doc for wb data
doesn't mention that you can use claim ids. This is another reason I thought it might not yet be implemented. Thanks again.
Reading the description of move qualifier it seems to suggest that
wd data
can be called with a claim id, but when I do I get all the output from the entity rather than just the info from the claim. I was able to filter out what I need withjq
, but it might be nice if supplying the claim id took care of this for me. This obviously isn't critical, but I thought I'd mention it.FWIW, it was an issue for me because I was operating on entities which had several claims with the same property which only differed on their qualifiers. The suggestion in the
wd mq
doc would have had me matching all of them.