Closed WardDeb closed 4 months ago
porechop's memory footprint seems excorbitant: ~.6TB for 140M reads at μ 5kb. We can look for an alternative, or only parse the data partially (and omit generation of trimmed files, just a report).
avoided using a subsampled set for porechop report
porechop's memory footprint seems excorbitant: ~.6TB for 140M reads at μ 5kb. We can look for an alternative, or only parse the data partially (and omit generation of trimmed files, just a report).