One line for each verse

[GoogleCodeExporter]

This's rather a suggestion, not an issue. If you got a forum, i'll post 
there.

I like the WEB version organization of the verse. Each one of them is 
listed as a separated paragraph. That looks elegant, far more better than 
the other's run-together layout, say, KJV.

Would you please add a 'forced mode' for any version of Bible, to show 
each verse on its own block?

Thanks!

Original issue reported on code.google.com by backbuf...@gmail.com on 2 Sep 2008 at 7:25

[GoogleCodeExporter]

This would be relatively easy to implement. I might try to do that tomorrow. The
hardest part is working out where in the UI to put it :)

BTW, there is a forum here: http://bpbible.com/forums. 

But reasonable feature requests (like this one) are probably best in the bug 
tracker
- then they can be managed more easily.

Original comment by benpmor...@gmail.com on 3 Sep 2008 at 12:17

• Changed state: Accepted
• Added labels: Type-Enhancement
• Removed labels: Type-Defect

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Done in r206.

The WEB orgainzation of verses doesn't put each on its own line - it has 
paragraph
breaks. The KJV currently just has the pilcrow(¶) to mark paragraph breaks - 
I'm not
sure whether I should change this into a paragraph break - it would be very 
easy to do.

Original comment by benpmor...@gmail.com on 11 Sep 2008 at 12:39

• Changed state: Fixed

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Great! Looks that I can happily switch from BibleDesktop(JSword) to BpBible now.

The only thing here left is how to turn it on? I found the "verse_per_line"
configuration value in the data.conf file, I changed it to True, but nothing
happened. I can't find any menu items for this either...

Original comment by backbuf...@gmail.com on 15 Sep 2008 at 5:04

[GoogleCodeExporter]

It won't be there until the next release. 
The verse_per_line configuration variable was in there, but never did anything. 
(It
was from a time when I thought it would be a good idea to implement, but never 
quite
got there)

If you want, you can try running from SVN - but it is more likely to be broken.
You'll also need a full distribution of python 2.5

Original comment by benpmor...@gmail.com on 15 Sep 2008 at 11:27