Open maythamfahmi opened 1 week ago
with all new tests introduces we are already at above 80%, I think for this stage it is fine so far. I think few more test for extensions method and the todo mentioned in the code for RSA, I will look at it hopefully we can hit 90%
I am generally not happy with anything less than 100%, except for the few occasional code paths that are more costly to cover, than expert review. Those are rare, and usually involve impossible corner-cases/code paths that are their purely to make the compiler happy (ie; default cases in switch statements, or exceptional paths that should never be hit). Simple libraries should approach 100% coverage, but not at the expense of alternate path permutations through the code. Complete coverage != thorough testing.
I am pleased to see the improvement in coverage though.
I agree with you if we can do 100% that would be awesome.
Contact Details
No response
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
not directly
Describe the solution you'd like
We want to imporve test coverage. Today it is aroud 70%, every thing 80% and up would be cool to reach.
Our ulitmate goal is to reach 100%.
Describe alternatives you've considered
No response
Additional context
No response
Priority Level
Low
Code of Conduct