Open mbecker20 opened 2 months ago
Facing this issue:
docker pull --platform=linux/arm64/v8 ghcr.io/mbecker20/periphery:latest-aarch64
latest-aarch64: Pulling from mbecker20/periphery
Digest: sha256:bd616228028a384dc9e64182c7d447c893f30641b70eb7cb57a3b0f2c4ee0bae
Status: Image is up to date for ghcr.io/mbecker20/periphery:latest-aarch64
image with reference ghcr.io/mbecker20/periphery:latest-aarch64 was found but does not match the specified platform: wanted linux/arm64/v8, actual: linux/amd64
arm tagged images are actually amd images
Hey, this is fixed, i've saved the Build to use the correct arm based instance type now. Thanks for letting me know, apologies!
Hi, there is another issue open to convert the images to true multi-platform. For now, arm support is user the ":latest-aarch64" tags:
* ghcr.io/mbecker20/komodo:latest-aarch64 * ghcr.io/mbecker20/periphery:latest-aarch64
Hello, I'm working on making my Node application compatible with both aarch64
and amd64
architectures.
Here’s the usual process I follow:
Ensure that buildx is available and initialized. If buildx isn’t already enabled in Docker, you can enable it by running:
docker buildx create --name mybuilder --use --bootstrap
docker buildx ls
Use the following command to build and push a multi-platform image
docker buildx build --platform linux/arm64/v8,linux/amd64 --builder mybuilder -t yourusername/yourimagename:tag --push .
--platform linux/amd64,linux/arm64
: Specifies the platforms to build for. yourusername/yourimagename:tag
: Tags the image. --push
: Pushes the built images directly to a Docker registry. This is necessary for multi-platform images as they must reside in a registry to be used effectively.I managed to accomplish everything (100%) with Komodo, except for the creation of the builder, using Extra Args.
The build status fails during the final push step on the builder.
...... && docker image push --all-tags yourusername/yourimagename
#17 exporting to image
#17 pushing layers 11.0s done
#17 pushing manifest for yourusername/yourimagename:latest@sha256:05a35169efb6d6a6008645f649639856852fe0546112656d7ac2f1cfb7c125a0
#17 pushing manifest for yourusername/yourimagename:latest@sha256:05a35169efb6d6a6008645f649639856852fe0546112656d7ac2f1cfb7c125a0 0.2s done
#17 pushing layers 0.0s done
#17 pushing manifest for yourusername/yourimagename:0.0.8@sha256:05a35169efb6d6a6008645f649639856852fe0546112656d7ac2f1cfb7c125a0 0.1s done
#17 pushing layers 0.0s done
#17 pushing manifest for yourusername/yourimagename:0.0@sha256:05a35169efb6d6a6008645f649639856852fe0546112656d7ac2f1cfb7c125a0 0.1s done
#17 pushing layers 0.0s done
#17 pushing manifest for yourusername/yourimagename:0@sha256:05a35169efb6d6a6008645f649639856852fe0546112656d7ac2f1cfb7c125a0 0.1s done
#17 pushing layers 0.1s done
#17 pushing manifest for yourusername/yourimagename:482e101@sha256:05a35169efb6d6a6008645f649639856852fe0546112656d7ac2f1cfb7c125a0 0.1s done
#17 DONE 11.7s
An image does not exist locally with the tag: yourusername/yourimagename
You can also remove push --all-tags; with a normal build, it was also re-pushing all tags if a tag was deleted from the Docker registry.
Excellent write up @arevindh, thank you.
Why make users have to specify their architecture with a different image tag? Multi platform images can solve this issue.
https://docs.docker.com/build/building/multi-platform/