Closed backus closed 8 years ago
Thoughts on this branch name?
For dependency upgrades I usually just use something like fix/upgrade-deps
. They aren't open for very long, and I don't know if there's a lot of value in naming it something more specific.
For dependency upgrades I usually just use something like fix/upgrade-deps. They aren't open for very long, and I don't know if there's a lot of value in naming it something more specific.
Yeah, branch names are empheral as they are not part of the git repositories history. Github keeps them as metadata, but given the fact we could leave github any time its not worth inflating the amount of information in a piece of data that will not be useful in the future.
All I care about is what happens to the master branch.
Merging anyway, because as I said: the branch name is not as important. Lets go with fix/...
as we used in the past.
Thoughts on this branch name? I've opened about 10 dependency update PRs so far and it usually isn't obvious how to name them uniquely. I think adopting something like
update/dependencies/march-2016
might be nice