Closed malcolmwhat closed 5 years ago
Not sure I understand. Are you suggesting adding an HTTP status code to the message when there is no error or exception thrown? I don't think we should do that.
That was the idea, but yeah, reading this back a few days later it doesn't really make sense.. The basic error handling is more than enough to handle out of the ordinary cases of timeouts or anything like that and the positive response is not needed. Thanks anyway
On the same vein as the error handing in #46 would it be ok to add result handling for successes of influx writes?
What I'm thinking is we add an output to influx batch with a
.then
on the writePoints which sends a message containing the204
for the successful write.Should I add this to the influx batch node or do you think it belongs in a separate node?