Clean up C support - Githubissues

mchakravarty commented 10 years ago

This is a follow up on #38:

[ ] Names: I think c might be a bit too short as an identifier (especially, as local definitions may shadow it). How about ansic, c11, or c_exp (which fits into the naming scheme of the other splices)?
[ ] We should share code between L.C.I.C.Marshall and L.C.I.ObjC.Marshall. It's almost the same and the language parameter in the functions is already set up to allow a multi-language version. (Maybe have a L.C.I.Marshall with all common code, and then, L.C.I.C.Marshall and L.C.I.ObjC.Marshall just add the language-specific bits.
[ ] Bump version and push to Hackage.

erikd commented 10 years ago

I think 'isoc' would be a better name than 'ansic'. ANSI C is basically dead. Nowadays, ANSI just ratified whatever the IOS C standard say.

mchakravarty commented 10 years ago

I think 'isoc' would be a better name than 'ansic'. ANSI C is basically dead. Nowadays, ANSI just ratified whatever the IOS C standard say.

Fair enough. So, do you think isoc or just c_exp would be better?

mchakravarty / language-c-inline