Closed mckib2 closed 4 years ago
I am a novice on this and cannot comment on which would be better. What's the rationale behind BART's scaling, or is that documented anywhere?
The best documentation I know of is here: https://buildmedia.readthedocs.org/media/pdf/bart-doc/latest/bart-doc.pdf
From pg 8: "The unit of measurement for kspace trajectory is 1/FOV. For example, a valid kspace trajectory for a 192-by-128 image should be scaled such that the x-coordinates cover the range of -192/2 to 192/2 and y-coordinates cover the range of -128/2 to 128/2."
Let's go ahead and leave as is now, and if something comes up later on down the road another issue can be opened.
It seems that BART's traj command uses different unit convention than mriphantom. Which scaling is better to use? Can we accommodate both? Currently kspace_shepp_logan uses mriphantom convention @Tronic
I don't feel very strongly either way, just need something that is consistent through the project and can be clearly communicated to users.