search

mcoenca / obo-relations

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/obo-relations
0 stars 0 forks source link

Please consider adding "activates" #26

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
The ontology currently has these concepts:

RO:0002406 directly activates
RO:0002407 indirectly activates

However, I don't see an "activates."  Can we add such a relation, and have it 
be a generalization of those two?

Original issue reported on code.google.com by kevin.co...@gmail.com on 19 Nov 2014 at 7:14

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
"positively regulates" is a parent to both "directly activates" and "indirectly 
activates":

http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/RO_0002213

I'm going to close this as wontfix. If none of those terms work for you, please 
reopen the issue with more details about your use case.

Original comment by ja...@overton.ca on 21 Nov 2014 at 4:31

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Thanks--that works.

Original comment by kevin.co...@gmail.com on 21 Nov 2014 at 4:56