Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
I just checked, and it seems to be working now.
Original comment by ja...@overton.ca
on 10 Mar 2015 at 1:23
Reopening.
I'm getting 404 'Term not found' on Ontobee for
<http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/BFO_0000062> 'preceded by'. It's pointing to
BFO, but it should be pointing to RO.
I thought it was working before, but now it's not.
On purl.obolibrary.org I see some other BFO IDs redirected to RO on Ontobee,
such as /obo/BFO_0000066. I don't see a redirect for /obo/BFO_0000063
'precedes' but it *is* being redirected properly.
I might have permissions to add a PURL for BFO_0000062 but I'm hesitant to make
any changes until I understand how this is supposed to work.
Original comment by ja...@overton.ca
on 25 Mar 2015 at 2:21
all the OBO purls first redirect to bbop, which controls the /obo domain are
rewritten to
/obo/NS/about/xxx
Then the partial redirect for /obo/NS/about/ is set to redirect to either
ontobee or the pages chosen by the ontology developers.
There is an in-place redirect for BFO.
If any BFO purls are not being redirected, the most likely problem is monkeying
around at bbop. Apparently that monkeying around is to redirect some BFO_ uris
to RO_. I speculate it is buggy.
There is no formal mechanism, at the moment, to redirect a term from one
namespace to another on ontobee. The proposed solution was the addition of
rdfs:isDefinedBy or some other relation that expresses that the term is under
the management of a particular ontology, stop specifying the ontology in the
redirect, and have ontobee use the management relation to decide how to display
the term.
status: Approved
id: /obo/BFO/about/ Modify record Show history
type: partial
target:
http://www.ontobee.org/browser/rdf.php?o=BFO&iri=http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/
maintainers: dosumis,ALANRUTTENBERG,girlwithglasses,CMUNGALL
Original comment by lori.f.r...@gmail.com
on 25 Mar 2015 at 3:35
Documentation of how PURLs work:
http://code.google.com/p/obo-foundry-operations-committee/wiki/OBOPURLDomain
Original comment by lori.f.r...@gmail.com
on 25 Mar 2015 at 4:05
Thanks for the explanation.
So what needs to be done to fix this? Some BFO IDs should redirect to RO on
Ontobee, and BFO_0000062 is one of them (see the RO wiki on ROAndBFO)
It sounds like we need someone at BBOP to add an exception for this term, like
the other BFO terms that RO has adopted. I have authorization to change some of
purl.obolibrary.org but I don't have access to the BBOP Apache configuration.
Original comment by ja...@overton.ca
on 31 Mar 2015 at 6:59
The redirect lives at the OCLC level. I think I added, but may need time to
percolate.
/obo/BFO_0000062
=>
http://www.ontobee.org/browser/rdf.php?o=RO&iri=http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/B
FO_0000062
Original comment by cmung...@gmail.com
on 3 Apr 2015 at 1:10
Thanks!
Original comment by ja...@overton.ca
on 3 Apr 2015 at 1:17
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
ja...@overton.ca
on 9 Feb 2015 at 3:18