Closed mbhall88 closed 2 years ago
Glad to hear that the conda package has found other users than myself!
Why not at all the scripts? I didn't include them at the time because i had no use for them, but others might.
Sure. I guess the only thing will be updating the dependencies for the recipe. At a quick glance some scripts needs Perl, some need graphviz, some need python (and associated libraries), some need R...
Yikes, sounds like a mess, but doable. I would only start with the scripts that are necessary.
I don't know which ones are absolutely necessary. @kvg?
I mean, i have used the mccortex conda package for years without any need for scripts. Why not create a separate conda package just for the scripts? It could depend on the package with the binary.
My personal use case was that I wanted to use the make-pipeline.pl
script inside the biocontainer image that is built from the bioconda package. In hindsight I could just download that script and use it inside a conda env with mccortex installed... Maybe that is a better way of doing it rather than creating a new recipe?
I think you should be just fine composing conda packages with the mccortex cons package. That package is just a binary if i recall correctly.
Hey,
There is a bioconda package for
mccortex
, which is great. But the scripts, such asmake-pipeline.pl
are not on PATH. If I (or yourselves) were to update the bioconda recipe to add these to the package, which scripts do you think would be necessary?