search

mcwdsi / OMRSE

The Ontology for Modeling and Representation of Social Entities
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
14 stars 7 forks source link

New term request: Cancer summary staging code #104

Closed mbrochhausen closed 4 years ago

mbrochhausen commented 4 years ago

editor preferred term: Cancer summary staging code alternative terms: tumor summary staging code textual definition: An information content entity that is the specified output of cancer summary staging. definition source for the textual definition n/a logical definition (or parent term) information content entity; is_specified_output of some tumor summary staging example of usage: The cancer summary staging code that is the outcome of the cancer summary staging performed on patient John Doe's clinical picture. term editor: Mathias Brochhausen

This is a temporary term that we hope will get pickup by OGMS, but we need an IRI for it now. Term request to OGMS is on the way.

CDowland commented 4 years ago

In the logical definition, might it be better to use the preferred term rather than the alternative term?

sjbost commented 4 years ago

I thought we had decided to drop "summary" from the term and just use "cancer staging code." Am I incorrect? If so, I need to edit my notes and action items from the meeting.

mbrochhausen commented 4 years ago

I think we decided to keep "summary".

On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 6:14 PM Sarah notifications@github.com wrote:

I thought we had decided to drop "summary" from the term and just use "cancer staging code." Am I incorrect? If so, I need to edit my notes and action items from the meeting.

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ufbmi/OMRSE/issues/104#issuecomment-639146426, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACF6DLRJIJCWVH2MG4TMKMTRVAMFNANCNFSM4NOBFOLQ .

sjbost commented 4 years ago

Just updated my notes to reflect that we ARE keeping summary.

mbrochhausen commented 4 years ago

In the logical definition, might it be better to use the preferred term rather than the alternative term?

true. we can change when adding the term.

dillerm commented 4 years ago

Is this good to go or does it still need further discussion?

mbrochhausen commented 4 years ago

Good to go with the change Clint suggested.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 9, 2020, at 5:41 PM, Matthew Diller notifications@github.com wrote:

 Is this good to go or does it still need further discussion?

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.