search

mdbesten / what-could-go-wrong

What Could Go Wrong
MIT License
2 stars 25 forks source link

New features From Zihao LIU #25

Open lucas233HAO opened 7 months ago

lucas233HAO commented 7 months ago

When the Card Czar picks a white card for further discussion, we might add an instruction that askes the Card Czar to explain the reason why he chose this card

lucas233HAO commented 7 months ago

Credit Statement Improvement - Contribution Tracking System: Implement an in-game feature that automatically tracks each player's contributions to the game, such as the number of cards submitted, the frequency of card selection, and any other relevant interactions.

lucas233HAO commented 7 months ago

Typical Task Enhancement : Introduce a series of 'challenge cards' that require players to perform tasks aligned with current AI ethical issues. These tasks could involve creating responses that reflect understanding of the AI4People ethical framework.

lucas233HAO commented 7 months ago

Organization Task Improvement: To enhance organization tasks within the game, incorporate a role-assignment feature where players are given specific roles that change dynamically each round, such as "Ethics Overseer," "Sustainability Steward," or "Innovation Manager."

lucas233HAO commented 7 months ago

Supportive Task Upgrade: Develop a feature that allows players to collaboratively create new prompt and response cards

lucas233HAO commented 7 months ago

Game Relevance Augmentation : Offer downloadable content packs that introduce new scenarios relevant to various AI applications like healthcare, finance, or transportation.

lucas233HAO commented 7 months ago

OCPP (On line Peer Production) Relevance Boost : Create an on-line and open-source platform where players can submit their own game expansions or modifications.