Open gnaygnak opened 6 years ago
Thanks for reporting the issue. However, this is not a lot of information to go on. can you provide some more details? for example the version you are using and some code with some comments at the places where you observed which inconsistency.
Ok, sure. and Thank you for your timely reply. Here I'll give your some version informal, the code I'm running and the result I got.
NAME VERSION
Augmentor 0.2.0
numpy 1.14.1
p = Augmentor.Pipeline("train")
#Point to a directory containing ground truth data.
#Images with the same file names will be added as ground truth data
# and augmented in parallel to the original data.
p.ground_truth("mask")
# Add operations to the pipeline as normal:
p.rotate(probability=1, max_left_rotation=5, max_right_rotation=5)
p.flip_left_right(probability=1)
p.zoom_random(probability=1, percentage_area=0.8)
p.flip_top_bottom(probability=1)
p.sample(6)
Finally, I got 10 pictures, they were 4 transformed masks and 4 corresponding transformed image and 2 image without corresponding transformed masks. Normally, I should have gotten 5 transformed masks and image correspondingly, but not! I don't know why. I hope I have express clearly. Thank you.
Hi @gnaygnak, how many images are in train
and mask
directories? Are there any sub folders in either directory?
I am having some issues with the new ground truth functionality, and trying to get to the bottom of it. In my tests things seem to work fine, but users are having some strange problems...
Hi @mdbloice , I have known the reason. When you are applying the ground_truth()
function, you must make sure that there is just single data in train
and mask
directories, right?
Thank you for replying.
Hi @gnaygnak, no it should work with any number of images. As long as the file names match between the two directories you can use any number of images. M.
Hi @mdbloice is there a way to have ground_truth() working even if the file names do not match ? in my case the ground truth file names are followed by "_mask"
Hi @Marwen-Bhj, no not at the moment, however you can use DataPipeline
for such situations:
p = Augmentor.DataPipeline(images, y)
Where images
contains any number of images/masks in array format (rather than reading from the disk). See this notebook for details on how to prepare the images
data structure here:
Multiple-Mask-Augmentation.ipynb
Hope this helps!
Hi @mdbloice thank you , it did help doing the task needed , yet as I saw in documentation ,this doesn't save the files anywhere , I tried using :
sample_with_array(augmented_images[i][j], save_to_disk=True)
in a for
loop
where augmented_images.shape
outputs (3, 2, 384, 768, 3) (3x2 samples , 348x768 and 3 channels ) if we transform it to an array using numpy
.
I need those generated samples and augmented images saved in a certain directory how can I do this ?
Hi @Marwen-Bhj, you could try using PIL/Pillow to create images from array data, so something like
from PIL import Image
im = Image.fromarray(augmented_images[...])
im.save('/path/image.png')
and do that in a loop, where augmented_images[...]
will have to be sliced accordingly to get the images you want out....
@mdbloice yes that's what I did eventually , just had to do some workaround with naming . thank you again.
@Marwen-Bhj ok sure, glad you got it to work out :-)
M.
When I was using your demo code to augment original and mask images identically, I found I got different number of augmented mask and images! I can't figure out why this happened. This meant the mask and image were NOT AUGMENTED IDENTICALLY, were they? Could you please help me to deal with this question, thanks.