Closed mdhaber closed 2 years ago
@acolum - it sounds like this addresses the concerns in gh-82, but i also wanted to check with you - do you agree with these changes?
@mdhaber Thank you for letting me know about these changes. I agree with the changes, but I also spotted some small issues:
@acolum Thank you for catching the mistakes. (I can't believe I let "cumulative density function" sneak in again!)
Is it OK to keep the scope of this PR to adding the performance section? I'm hesitant to also change the order of the sections here, since the purpose is to address gh-82. I will open another PR with that suggestion.
Oops... I did intend to fix those mistakes here. Done in cd51a54eac025474df5259a73561a0b74f541abd.
I also agree on these changes @mdhaber.
Reference issue
Closes gh-82
What does this implement/fix?
This adds a section about the performance of
scipy.stats.studentized_range
.Aditional information
I initially decided against a separate section for this because performance claims often need to be qualified with lots of details. I have omitted these here, but I believe the statements are representative of what one would conclude upon more careful review of the referenced paper.