Markdown of OL with UL is outputted in not Good HTML.

[lenlenlen]

Thank you published a very nice program. Please let me bug reports today.

In the case of this example, MMMarkdown is not correctly changed into HTML.

【Example Markdown】

1.test
2.tester
3.testing

*boxing
*kick boxing
*karate

【Result HTML】

<ol>
<li>test</li>
<li>tester</li>
<li><p>testing</p></li>
<li><p>boxing</p></li>
<li>kick boxing</li>
<li>karate</li>
</ol>

【Result that I want is this.】

<ol>
<li>test</li>
<li>tester</li>
<li>testing</li>
</ol>

<ul>
<li>boxing</li>
<li>kick boxing</li>
<li>karate</li>
</ul>

I hope that it will be fixed. Thanks for reading so far.

[mdiep]

Thanks for the report! I'm still considering how to handle this. I understand why you expect there to be 2 lists, but most implementations will render this just like MMMarkdown.

[lenlenlen]

Happy new year! mdiep! Thank you for reply! I understand, I think MMMarkdown is very nice program. And I appreciate to you. But, When you will be fixed, I will more appreciate very much! Thanks for reading so far!

[albertbori]

I ran into this issue as well. Here in github, the following markdown:

- Cool
- Neat

1. Item 1
1. Item 2

Results in:

• Cool
• Neat
  1. Item 1
  2. Item 2

But when I run it through MMMarkdown, I get:

<ul>
<li>Cool</li>
<li><p>Neat</p>
</li>
<li><p>Item 1</p>
</li>
<li>Item 2</li>
</ul>

(Aside: Unfortunately, in both, I get that stray paragraph tag in some of the items, which cases extra spacing within list items.)

[SerenadeX]

Seeing this as well. It works if you start with unordered lists and follow with an ordered list and vice versa. Is progress being made on this?

[mdiep]

I haven't worked on this at all, but now that CommonMark is rendering this as two separate lists, I'll take a look at updating the behavior.